Built for EPC firms and engineering consultants

Pricing structured around your delivery programme

We don't publish fixed prices because the right commercial arrangement depends on your document volume, team structure, delivery programme, and data residency requirements. A short call is the fastest way to get accurate numbers.

Get Pricing

30 minutes · No obligation

Priced against engineering hours saved
Scoped to delivery volume, not generic seats
Flexible deployment — cloud or on-premise

Pricing is scoped around your delivery capacity, document volume, and deployment requirements — not generic per-seat licensing. Talk to us and we'll structure something that fits.

Evaluation & PoC

Pilot Program

10 to 50 P&ID drawings

For engineering teams validating connected model generation, DEXPI conversion accuracy, and source-level verification on a sample plant package.

  • Full topological graph extraction
  • DEXPI XML / ISO 15926 sample exports
  • HITL audit & discrepancy review walkthrough
  • Sample line lists & master tag registers
  • Dedicated technical onboarding session
Scope a Pilot
Most Common Starting Point

Project Engagement

Full unit or brownfield project

For EPC firms and owner-operators executing a complete brownfield digitization, revamp, or CAD migration for an entire operating unit.

  • Complete unit-level P&ID package digitisation
  • SmartPlant P&ID (SPPID) & AVEVA schema mapping
  • Cross-drawing off-page connector (OPC) resolution
  • Full tabular deliverable generation (Line lists, MTOs)
  • Priority SLA & verification support
Get a Project Quote

Enterprise & Facility License

Plant-wide or multi-site deployment

For operators and global engineering consultancies standardizing plant data pipelines across multi-site operating assets and internal AI context systems.

  • Continuous plant-wide digitisation & revision tracking
  • Private cloud (VPC) or on-premise air-gapped deployment
  • Novek Context API (REST & GraphQL) access for AI agents
  • Custom symbol legend & standard rule training
  • Dedicated solutions engineer & enterprise SLA
  • Enterprise SSO, role-based access control & SOC2 compliance
Contact Enterprise Sales
Smaller teams

Independent consultant or smaller firm?

If you handle a smaller volume of extraction work, we can scope a lighter starting option around your workflow, package size, and delivery needs. No need to overcommit.

Let's Talk

How buyers usually scope Novek

The first decision is usually not feature breadth. It is which engineering deliverable you want to produce faster, cheaper, and with less manual effort.

See the workflows teams start with →
Factor 01Active

How much delivery volume is in scope?

If you are starting with one live package or client job, begin with Project Team. If several teams or client packages need the same outputs, move to Engineering Team.

Novek scoping variable.
Factor 02Active

Who is producing and checking the outputs?

Novek is most valuable when engineers, delivery leads, and QA reviewers all work from the same structured outputs and source-linked evidence.

Novek scoping variable.
Factor 03Active

Which deliverable do you produce most often?

Most teams start with tag registers, line lists, equipment lists, MTOs, or datasheet extraction because those workflows carry the most repetitive engineering effort.

Novek scoping variable.
Factor 04Active

What privacy and localization requirements apply?

Cloud works for many teams, but some customers need tighter deployment control, regional data handling, or client-specific privacy requirements.

Novek scoping variable.
Factor 05Active

Are you buying for one team or a wider rollout?

We can start around one delivery team and expand once the time, cost, and quality gains are obvious to the wider organization.

Novek scoping variable.

Why the commercial case is usually straightforward

Novek does not need to replace your engineering team. It only needs to remove a large share of the repetitive extraction work those engineers are still doing manually.

Deliver in minutes, not days

Teams use Novek to compress the repetitive engineering work involved in turning source documents into usable lists, registers, and structured outputs.

Much faster turnaround on technical deliverables

Lower the cost of delivery

When engineers spend less time manually extracting and cleaning data, the cost per package drops and delivery margins improve.

More output from the same engineering team

Improve accuracy without sacrificing trust

Every extracted field, flagged mismatch, and generated output can still be tied back to the source, which improves QA confidence and lowers rework.

Cleaner outputs with less QA pain

Pricing questions we hear most often

These are the questions that usually come up when EPC firms and engineering consultants evaluate Novek for real technical delivery work.

Get Started

Start with one legacy P&ID. See the connected model.

Bring a sample drawing package from an active or brownfield project. In the demo, we'll parse the drawings live, inspect the generated engineering graph, and export DEXPI or tabular deliverables you can verify.

Run on your actual project P&ID package
Inspect the connected topological model live
Export sample DEXPI XML and line lists
Enterprise security & non-disclosure ready